FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES OF ARMENIAN MILITARY EDUCATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE RA ARMED FORCES

Authors

  • Artsrun Hovhannisyan V. Sargsyan Military Academy of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Armenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v2i73.253

Keywords:

transformation of armed forces, military education, military schools, the fourth industrial revolution, warfare, multi-domain operations

Abstract

This article examines the traditions of Western military educational institutions, presenting the motives behind their emergence, transformation, and key guarantees of success.

Parallels are drawn with advanced European countries and the American military education system, highlighting their specific characteristics. Particular attention is paid to the long-running struggle between the US military and Congress during the Cold War. The article then comments on the paradoxes of modern military operations related to the level of education and programs of the officer corps.

Based on the findings, the author discusses the key challenges of military education in the Republic of Armenia in the context of the concept of transforming the Armed Forces of the Republic of Armenia. Along with the acquisition of the latest technologies and weapons, the need for a comprehensively developed and educated officer corps based on interdisciplinary military science, a unique and unified military art, and flexible and adaptive educational programs is emphasized.

References

Huntington S. (2020), Zinvory' & petowt'yowny' /Soldier and the state/, Yerevan, “Limowsh”.

Demetr K. (2007), Germanskiy ofitserskiy korpus v obshchestve i gosudarstve. 1650-1945 /The German Officer-Corps in Society and State, 1650-1945/, Moscow, “Tsentrpoligraf”.

Kesselring A. (1957), Voyna v basseyne sredizemnogo morya /War in the Mediterranean basin, Results of the Second World War/, Moscow, Publishing house of foreign literature.

Pikht V. (1957), German soldier, Results of the Second World War, Moscow, published by Foreign Literature Publishing House.

Trunov F. O. (2022), German model of military reforms, Moscow, https://inion.ru/site/assets/files/6804/2022_mon_germanskaia_model_1.pdf#:~:text=%D0%A2%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%2C%20%D0%A4.%D0%9E.,ISBN%20978%2D5%2D248%2D01008%2D0

Shvab K. (2019), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Moscow, “Eksmo”.

Balet J. (1910), Military Japan: The Japanese Army and Navy In 1910. Yokohama.

Bond B. (1972), The Victorian Army and the Staff College 1854-1914. London: Eyre Methuen.

Converse E. III (1998) (Ed.) Forging the sword: Selecting, educating, and training cadets and junior offic¬ers in the modern world. Chicago: Imprint Publications.

Maki J. (1945), Japanese Militarism: Its Cause and Cure. New York.

Masland J., Radway L. (1957), Soldiers and Scholars: Military Education and National Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Millotat C. O. E. (1992), Understanding the Prussian-German General Staff System. Carlisle Barracks: U. S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute.

Preston A. (1988), Perspectives in the History of Military Education and Professionalism. In Borowski, H. (Ed.), The Harmon Memorial Lectures in Military History, 1959–1987: a collection of the first thirty Harmon lectures given at the United States Air Force Academy. Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, United States Air Force.

Rosinski H. (1939), The German Army, London.

Stewart A. (2018), “Necessarily of an experimental character”: The interwar_ period and the Imperial Defence College. In D. E. Delaney, R. C. Engen & M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Military Education and the British Empire, 1815–1949, Vancouver: UBC Press.

Vagts A. (1937), A History of Militarism, New York.

Van Creveld M. (1990), The Training of Officers: From Military Professionalism to Irrelevance, New York, Free Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-23