The study of the lexical synonymy at the Institute according to specializations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v1i60.42Keywords:
lexical synonymy, synonymic line, synonymic-antonymic lines, synonymy and polysemy, special vocabulary, case study at the Institute, text work, dictionary work, interactive teaching methods, methodological approachesAbstract
. This article examines the questions of teaching modern Armenian synonyms by lexical synonymy and antonymy commonalities and differences, as well as by discovering of the relationship of polysemy and synonymy in the non-professional faculties of the university system (according to the specializations and their appropriate vocabulary).
- The synonymous and antonymous relations are typical of the words. Polysemy, the general phenomenon of the words and stable compounds, is the combination of more than one meanings in one language unit. In general synonymy and polysemy, antonymy and polysemy of the words have obvious generalities: the same word gets a synonymic or antonymic correlation with other words not entirely, but by its separate meanings.
- According to their semantic and usual-stylistic aspects, the synonyms are distinguished by adequate and inadequate ones. The lexical synonyms realize their synonymous relations in the speech environment.
- The synonymic lines may be different from the side of quantity. Synonymic lines of the words is a synchronic language reality, which consists of two or more words. Reccuring to the antonymic lines of the words it is necessary to observe them in parallel with synonymic lines: antonymic words are included into synonymic correlation with other words making certain synonymic - antonymic lines.
- Recommended to apply students' acquired theoretical knowledge in practice according to the comparative table with three columns, prisma and concepts map methodological approaches, text work and Web-Quest methods, dictionary and creative works, computer Microsoft Power Point (or Google) presentation, question, as well as according to performing of exercises and tasks.
References
Առաքելյան Վ. Դ., Խաչատրյան Ա. Հ., Էլոյան Ս. Ա., Ժամանակակից հայոց լեզու, հ. 1, Ե., ՀՍՍՀ ԳԱ հրատ., 1979:
Ավետիսյան Լ. Ն., Սողոմոնյան Մ. Ռ., Հայոց լեզվի գործնական դասընթաց: Բառագիտություն: Ուսումնական ձեռնարկ բուհերի ոչ մասնագիտական ֆակուլտետների համար Ե., «Էդիթ Պրինտ» հրատ., 2022:
Սարուխանյան Ս., Դալլաքյան Ա., Դիշաղաջյան Ն., Ուսուցման ժամանակակից մեթոդներ, հնարներ և վարժություններ, ԿԱԻ Լոռու մասնաճյուղ, «Վանատուր» ՍՊԸ տպ., 2008:
Սուքիասյան Ա. Մ., Հոմանիշները ժամանակակից հայերենում, Ե., Եր. համալս. հրատ., 1971:
Азимов Э. Г., Щукин А. Н., Новый словарь методических терминов и понятий (теория и практика обучения языкам), М., Изд-во ИКАР, 2009.
Селевко Г. К., Энциклопедия образовательных технологий, Том 1, М., Народное образование, 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Author and Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.