ALTERNATIVE INSTRUMENTS FOR VERIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Arpine Ghlechyan ASPU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v3i66.145

Keywords:

Educational outcomes, educational reform, assessment methods, portfolio, Honors box, Scottish Certificate, Creative diary, Case method

Abstract

As a result of this study, it became clear that alternative tools for assessing and evaluating learning outcomes play an important role in modern educational systems. The limitations of traditional assessment methods, such as direct measurement of knowledge and a focus on the outcome rather than the process of learning, highlight the need for the application of alternative approaches.

Alternative assessment tools, such as project work, portfolios, self-assessment, and peer assessment, allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of learners' knowledge, skills, and abilities. They also aim to develop creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration skills, which are essential for education in the 21st century.

The study showed that alternative assessment tools contribute not only to learner engagement and motivation but also create opportunities for personalized approaches in teaching and assessment processes. As a result, educational institutions should incorporate alternative tools into their assessment methodologies, ensuring an improvement in the quality of the educational process and expanded development opportunities for learners.

From this perspective, future research could explore the effectiveness of alternative assessment tools in various educational environments, as well as ways to integrate them with traditional assessment systems.

References

Asatryan L., Hakobyan G., Asatryan M. et al. (2017), Mankavarjhowt'yown /Pedagogy/, Yerevan, “Artagers”>> Publishing House:

Makaryan A. (2015), Ayly'ntranqayin gnahatman anhrajheshtowt'yowny' tarrakan dprocowm: Krt'owt'yan oraki chap'man, gnahatman himnaxndirnery': Mijagayin gitajhoghovi nyowt'eri jhoghovac'ow /The need for alternative assessment in elementary school. Issues of measuring and assessing the quality of education: Collection of materials of the international conference/, Yerevan, “Mankavarzh” Publishing House, p. 400:

Vardumyan S., Harutyunyan L., Jaghinyan N., Varella G., Abordo E. (2003), Jhamanakakic mankavarjhakan motecowmner /Modern pedagogical approaches/, Yerevan, “AIREX” Publishing House, p. 20:

Podlasy I. (2007), Pedagogika: uchebnik /Pedagogy: textbook/, Moscow, “Высшее образование”, c45-48.

Biggs J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.scirp.org/pdf/CE20122600021_27076494.pdf

Black P. & William D. (1998), Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy & Practice. https://www.gla.ac.uk/t4/learningandteaching/files/PGCTHE/BlackandWiliam1998.pdf

Nicol D. & Macfarlane-Dick D. (2006), Formative Assessment and Self-regulated Learning. Studies in Higher Education. https://www.reap.ac.uk/reap/public/papers/DN_SHE_Final.pdf

Shepard L. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher. https://www.colorado.edu/education/sites/default/files/attached-files/The%20Role%20of%20Assessment%20in%20a%20Learning%20Culture.pdf

Shute V. (2008), Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3102/0034654307313795

Downloads

Published

2025-03-27